Search
Close this search box.

We are creating some awesome events for you. Kindly bear with us.

EXCLUSIVE – A debate on BYOD – To do, or not to do

EXCLUSIVE - A debate on BYOD - To do

At the recently concluded Public Sector Chief Information Officer Convention and Exhibition (CIO Convex) 2016 in Malaysia, Mr. Mohit Sagar, Editor-in-chief at OpenGov moderated a debate on the contentious issue of BYOD (Bring your own device). The strong arguments on both sides presented serious food for thought.

The proposition: 'Malaysia should have a favourable policy on BYOD'

Mr. Gerrit Bahlman, Director of Information Technology, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong and Mr. Thillai Raj T. Ramanathan, Chief Technology Officer, MIMOS Berhad, Malaysia were speaking for the motion. 

Arguing against the motion were Mr. Glenn Ashe, Former GCIO Attorney General Department, Australia and  Mr. Ganesh Kanagarajah, Head, Strategic Products and Services Governance, Group IT PETRONAS Risk Management Division

Opening statements

For the motion- Mr. Ramanathan

Mr. Ramanathan took the floor to make the case in favour of the motion. He listed several points, based on his experiences, supporting the idea of a favourable BYOD policy:

  1. It helps to attract and retain talented millennials who are comfortable working on their own devices, anytime, anywhere.
  2. Employees take better care of their own devices, installing and updating security software. Physical theft/loss has also been seen to go down with BYOD.
  3. BYOD saves costs for the organisation.
  4. Employees use a wide variety of applications, which might bring better platforms for collaboration and innovation to the notice of senior management. 

Against the motion- Mr. Kangarajah

Mr Kangarajah presented several arguments against adopting BYOD:

  1. Will the organisation bear liability risk for unlicensed products? If consumer grade products are used for enterprise work, it might violate licensing agreements. There’s a high probability of that happening if consumers are permitted to use their own devices.
  2. BYOD presents huge potential for distraction at work. What if staff spend increasing amounts of time on social media?
  3. The IT department would have to support a wide range of devices with different standards, operating systems and applications, increasing overheads and complicating support.
  4. BYOD could hamper work-life balance.

For the motion- Mr. Bahlman

Productivity perspective: Mr. Bahlman stated that for the millennial generation there’s no separation between work and life. BYOD would enhance productivity for them, allowing them to manage their personal affairs, while working.

Security perspective: Employees might use their own device irrespective of guidelines. It might be better to allow it, regulate it and provide a work environment on the device to ensure security.

Against the motion- Mr. Ashe

Mr. Ashe questioned the proposition itself, asking who or what is the BYOD policy favourable for? Is it favourable to the Malaysian government, the employees working for the Malaysian government?

He admitted that BYOD has a role to play in today’s workplace. But serious thought is required before going full steam ahead with it. He brought up security concerns and said that it was essential to protect data assets. It would be important to have a structure in place before embarking on the BYOD journey.

Rebuttals

For the motion- Mr. Ramanathan

He said that there is no longer much difference between enterprise and consumer devices. And BYOD enhances communication and boosts collaboration. So what is of benefit to employees is beneficial for the Malaysian government as well. And he said that technology rightly implemented can take care of security concerns. You can easily create a sandbox on the phone and wipe that if the device is lost.

Against the motion- Mr. Kangarajah

Does BYOD actually reduce cost? If staff is company issued devices, from a vendor, the company knows the cost and can manage the cost. But with BYOD, you will need a whole bunch of administrative controls to monitor the devices, prevent data leakage. Also, what happens if a device is lost or it breaks down, maybe due to work related issues.

For the motion- Mr. Bahlman

         Critical data should not be present on the devices in the first place. If it is not, then the question of administrative controls does not arise.
         
         
         

All data must be classified. Non-sensitive data, which might be bulk of what some employees are dealing with can be stored on own devices without adding to risk.

BYOD might be more expensive in the short-term because systems and services would have to be re-designed from the ground-up, to ensure that important data is protected. But it is an investment which will pay off in the long run. Successful implementation of a secure BYOD environment demonstrates a commitment to understanding your data.

Against the motion- Mr. Ashe

There might still be mixing of personal and work data on staff’s own devices, notwithstanding best efforts. If an Ipad is lost, the IT department might want to wipe it clean remotely. But what f the employee doesn’t want because he/she has valuable personal material on it.

Conclusion – A consensus

By this time, views seemed to converge, though the debaters were supposed to be on opposing sides. Strong policies are required and policies cannot be created reactively, on the fly. Also, policies by themselves might not be enough. Constant monitoring is required.

         BYOD implemented the right way can enable delivery of internal services with flexibility and agility, enhance productivity, collaboration and innovation.
         
         
         

The debate was not over yet!

The debaters appeared to have moved to the side in favour of the motion. When Mr. Sagar asked the audience, composed of officials from the Malaysian government’s digital agencies, if they supported a favourable BYOD policy for the Malaysian government, the answer was a resounding Yes.

But there were a coda yet to come.

         Mr. Sagar asked the audience if they would be okay with the IT department in their organisation installing applications and implementing security controls on their personal devices, there were more than a few NOs heard from the audience. They were not willing to relinquish even partial control over their devices.
         
         
         

Like many other aspects of digital transformation, it is clear what needs to be done, in theory. But it is about people at the end of the day. That has to be kept in mind for practical implementation of any policy or strategy and that would be the crucial difference between success and failure.

PARTNER

Qlik’s vision is a data-literate world, where everyone can use data and analytics to improve decision-making and solve their most challenging problems. A private company, Qlik offers real-time data integration and analytics solutions, powered by Qlik Cloud, to close the gaps between data, insights and action. By transforming data into Active Intelligence, businesses can drive better decisions, improve revenue and profitability, and optimize customer relationships. Qlik serves more than 38,000 active customers in over 100 countries.

PARTNER

As a Titanium Black Partner of Dell Technologies, CTC Global Singapore boasts unparalleled access to resources.

Established in 1972, we bring 52 years of experience to the table, solidifying our position as a leading IT solutions provider in Singapore. With over 300 qualified IT professionals, we are dedicated to delivering integrated solutions that empower your organization in key areas such as Automation & AI, Cyber Security, App Modernization & Data Analytics, Enterprise Cloud Infrastructure, Workplace Modernization and Professional Services.

Renowned for our consulting expertise and delivering expert IT solutions, CTC Global Singapore has become the preferred IT outsourcing partner for businesses across Singapore.

PARTNER

Planview has one mission: to build the future of connected work. Our solutions enable organizations to connect the business from ideas to impact, empowering companies to accelerate the achievement of what matters most. Planview’s full spectrum of Portfolio Management and Work Management solutions creates an organizational focus on the strategic outcomes that matter and empowers teams to deliver their best work, no matter how they work. The comprehensive Planview platform and enterprise success model enables customers to deliver innovative, competitive products, services, and customer experiences. Headquartered in Austin, Texas, with locations around the world, Planview has more than 1,300 employees supporting 4,500 customers and 2.6 million users worldwide. For more information, visit www.planview.com.

SUPPORTING ORGANISATION

SIRIM is a premier industrial research and technology organisation in Malaysia, wholly-owned by the Minister​ of Finance Incorporated. With over forty years of experience and expertise, SIRIM is mandated as the machinery for research and technology development, and the national champion of quality. SIRIM has always played a major role in the development of the country’s private sector. By tapping into our expertise and knowledge base, we focus on developing new technologies and improvements in the manufacturing, technology and services sectors. We nurture Small Medium Enterprises (SME) growth with solutions for technology penetration and upgrading, making it an ideal technology partner for SMEs.

PARTNER

HashiCorp provides infrastructure automation software for multi-cloud environments, enabling enterprises to unlock a common cloud operating model to provision, secure, connect, and run any application on any infrastructure. HashiCorp tools allow organizations to deliver applications faster by helping enterprises transition from manual processes and ITIL practices to self-service automation and DevOps practices. 

PARTNER

IBM is a leading global hybrid cloud and AI, and consulting services provider, helping clients in more than 175 countries capitalize on insights from their data, streamline business processes, reduce costs and gain the competitive edge in their industries. Nearly 3,800 government and corporate entities in critical infrastructure areas such as financial services, telecommunications and healthcare rely on IBM’s hybrid cloud platform and Red Hat OpenShift to affect their digital transformations quickly, efficiently, and securely. IBM’s breakthrough innovations in AI, quantum computing, industry-specific cloud solutions and business services deliver open and flexible options to our clients. All of this is backed by IBM’s legendary commitment to trust, transparency, responsibility, inclusivity, and service. For more information, visit www.ibm.com